In Wally’s last article he made some valid points, but – and this is going to shock you – I have some stuff to say. Mr. Cleaver claims, “turning guys on shouldn't be like a rubik's cube, it's not complicated stuff.” I agree with what he insinuated; it shouldn’t be hard to make a guy cum. On the other hand, I disagree with the contrast of men to rubik's cubes. I think guys, in relation to sex, are exactly comparable to rubick's cubes. Rubik's cubes may seem challenging but there is a formula, and once you know the formula it can be solved in mere minutes if not seconds. Just make sure everything lines up, twist here, wiggle that and *bam*, you’ve cum to the solution.
Women are the elusive, unique, and complex challenge.
You see, Wally et all, the list of male “turn offs” is all fine and dandy but at the end of the day they are really more like “turn downers.” In the end, the guy is still going to cum. The heat might be lowered, the intensity might be compromised, the mood might be waning, but he’s not fully “off.” A woman, on the other hand: when she’s turned off, she’s turned off. (And, if she’s turned of “it” is not happening… zilch, zip, nadda, she’s either faking it or planning her exit strategy.) It takes a long time to heat us up and mere seconds to bring us back down. Thus, our turn offs are far more important. Sorry, but it’s true.
Take an anatomy class, sober up, slow down, clip your fingernails, don’t suffocate me, get my name right, read my signals (correctly) and SHUT THE FUCK UP! If you do this and spread the word to other males, we’ll all fuck happily ever after!
